Skip to the content

The Understory: Replanting River Guardians

By Berks Nature

The Understory: Replanting River Guardians
Many (dirty) hands make light work – an eager team of community volunteers helped Marion Rod & Gun Club plant 111 trees!

Trout need trees.

Yes it’s true. Even as these alluring fish dart and glide beneath the water’s surface, they rely on their terrestrial, streamside neighbors – the trees – to keep their watery home cool and habitable. Without shade, trout streams can get hot, placing inordinate, even fatal, stress on the resident fish.

Streamside trees do more than cast shade. Trees collect carbon dioxide, removing these greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and mitigating climate change. Their roots also filter stormwater and hold the stream bank in place, resisting erosion and preventing excessive quantities of soil from entering the water.

Trees are a river’s guardians.

Imagine then the grief of the Marion Township Rod & Gun Club upon discovering 34 dead and dying ash trees in their streamside forest.

A 1.5-mile stretch of the Tulpehocken Creek flows through the Club’s property and is stocked with trout each year, much to the membership’s delight. But the concurrent loss of so many ash trees in an already meager forest threatened the long-term health and fishable future of the creek.

The Marion Township Rod & Gun Club’s loss, while lamentable, reflects an even more grim, national trend. Across the upper Midwest and northeastern regions of the U.S., ash forests are under attack, and the culprit is no bigger than a dime.

The emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) is a diminutive, but attractive beetle dressed in a glimmering green, metallic exoskeleton. Hailing from Asia, the emerald ash borer was first identified in the U.S. in Michigan in 2002. Within its native range, the emerald ash borer is but a nuisance – Asian ash trees are more resistant and local predators keep the beetle population at bay.

Without these safeguards, emerald ash borer beetles are booming in the U.S. and at a high cost.

By 2009, just seven years following the ash borer’s arrival on U.S. soil, ash trees in the Upper Huron watershed in southeast Michigan had suffered a 99% mortality rate and ash tree seed production had ceased.

How can one tiny beetle provoke such a devastating fallout? The beetle’s larvae are lethal.

Adult ash borer beetles lay their eggs on ash trees, or any member of the Fraxinus genus, and, upon hatching, the larvae bury themselves into the tree, through its bark, to feast upon its phloem.

Phloem is a network of living tissue within the inner bark that ferries sap, rich in sugar and nutrients, throughout the tree, supplying energy and food where it is needed. Like our bloodstream and its web of veins and arteries, phloem supplies life-sustaining fluids to all living parts of the tree through a system of channels running from its subterranean roots all the way up to its sky-reaching leaves.

As emerald ash borer larvae feed on the phloem of ash trees, their sap veins are severed, inflicting mortifying harm.

Michigan, the epicenter of the emerald ash borer’s plague, has lost 40 million ash trees. Hundreds of millions more have succumbed nationwide. Here too in Pennsylvania, the emerald ash borer is invading our forests. Approximately 308 million ash trees grew in Pennsylvania before the emerald ash borer arrived here in 2007. As of 2014, these ash forests had been reduced by 12%.

The 34 ash trees that perished at Marion Rod & Gun Club are the latest casualties in this bleak forecast; victims of the emerald ash borer.

Even without the ash trees, the Tulpehocken Creek needed a streamside forest, but the Marion Rod & Gun Club would need help imparting new life into the mourning banks of the Tulpehocken.

Fortunately, a robustcommunity of land and water stewards swelled around the Marion Township Rod & Gun Club. The Berks County Conservation District awarded $4,735 to purchase trees while Berks Nature designed a tree planting plan that would not only replace the lost ash, but also bolster the existing streamside forest currently laying sparse claim to the Tulpehocken Creek’s floodplain.

Club members were joined by volunteers from the Tulpehocken Creek Watershed Association and Berks Nature staff on October 10, 2020 to plant 111 native trees.

“Mother Nature is the one who tells us what to do,” explained Larry Lloyd, Senior Ecologist at Berks Nature, while gesturing at the mature sycamore trees and silky dogwood shrubs already flourishing along the Tulpehocken’s banks.

These were the trees that inspired Berks Nature’s planting strategy, each native species carefully picked to reflect Mother Nature’s plans. Sycamore and silky dogwood were joined by black willow, swamp white oak, river birch, and red maple: a diverse assemblage of trees perfectly adapted to take root along the creek.

Larry Lloyd, Berks Nature’s Senior Ecologist, instructs volunteers on how to properly plant a tree

Together, this varied assemblage of native trees will minimize the harm inflicted by the emerald ash borer beetle. As these young trees grow and mature, their canopies will fill gaps left by the fallen ash, shading the sensitive communities below. Under the shade, sun-greedy disrupters like exotic honeysuckle vines fare poorly, granting advantage to native, shade-loving plants, while trout and other aquatic animals will rejoice in the refreshingly cool flow of the Tulpehocken Creek.

As the emerald ash borer infestation spreads, ash forests across the United States are likely to fall. Local action, like those taken by the Marion Township Rod & Gun Club, Berks Nature, and the Tulpehocken Creek community, can preserve the stability of our forest ecosystems by replacing lost ash trees.

We may lose ash trees, but we cannot lose our forests: we cannot lose cool water, stable soil, or clean air.

We all need trees.


The State of the Environment evaluates specific data and trends in five environmental categories: Air, Energy, Land, Waste, and Water. Within each category, several specific quantitative indicators are evaluated using available data, trends in the data are assessed, and specific action items that residents can practice to make each specific indicator more “positive” are identified. The five general environmental categories, as well as the specific environmental indicators evaluated, were selected by an interactive process. Berks Nature established subcommittees for each category, with each subcommittee headed by a professional with substantial experience in the specific field. These subcommittees discussed candidate indicators, and narrowed down the list of indicators to be used to 4-5 specific indicators where quantitative data were available.
While we could have selected many indicators regarding the health of the environment, our panel of experts chose the 25 contained in this report as a start. We pursued measurable, actionable data that would allow individuals, corporations and organizations to see where they could make lifestyle changes that would have increasingly positive effects on our local environment, the state, the country and the world. We used a third party consultant to research and write up the indicators and data. While we have tried to be as neutral as possible, obviously Berks Nature has a bias toward environmental conservation and protection. Rest assured, the data contained in this report is accurate and the facts will ultimately speak for themselves. We hope you learn something new, consider changing some of your behaviors as a result, and we invite you to become engaged in our work and that of other conservation and environmental organizations; the health of our community depends on it.